(ORDER LIST: 532 U.S.)

MONDAY, MAY 14, 2001

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorariare granted. The judgment is vacated and the case isremanded to the United States Court of Appeals for theSixth Circuit for further consideration in light ofArtuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4 (2000).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitionsfor writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.

The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petitionfor a writ of certiorari out-of-time under Rule 14.5 isdenied.

The motion of the Special Master for fees andreimbursement of expenses is granted, and the SpecialMaster is awarded a total of $12,963.14 for the periodOctober 16, 2000 Ð April 16, 2001, to be paid equallyby the parties.

The motion of Self-Insurance Institute of America,Inc. (SHA) for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae isgranted. The motion of National Association ofSubrogation Professionals, Inc., for leave to file abrief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of AARP,et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae isgranted. The motion of American Association of HealthPlans, et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiaeis granted. The motion of Central States, Southeast andSouthwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund for leave tofile a brief as amicus curiae is granted.

The motion of National Legal Foundation for leaveto file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.

The motion of the Acting Solicitor General todispense with printing the joint appendix is granted.

The motion of petitioner for leave to file asupplemental joint appendix under seal is granted.

The motion of petitioner for reconsideration oforder denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis isdenied.

The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis is denied. Petitioners are allowed untilJune 4, 2001, within which to pay the docketing feerequired by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition incompliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The motion of Rutherford Institute for leave tofile a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion ofrespondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis isgranted. The petition for a writ of certiorari isgranted.

CERTIORARI DENIED

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration ordecision of this petition.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration ordecision of this petition.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ ofcertiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.Justice Breyer would grant certiorari.

COMMON LAW CERTIORARI DENIED

The petition for a writ of common law certiorariis denied.

HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus aredenied.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ ofhabeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

MANDAMUS DENIED

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

The petition for writ of mandamus and/orprohibition is denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

The motion for leave to file a petition forrehearing is denied.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

Robert L. Fenton, of Monterey, California, havingbeen suspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of November 27, 2000; and a rule having beenissued and served upon him requiring him to show causewhy he should not be disbarred; and the time to file aresponse having expired;

It is ordered that Robert L. Fenton is disbarredfrom the practice of law in this Court.

Jonathan James Ezer, of Bel Air, Texas, having beensuspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of November 27, 2000; and a rule having beenissued and served upon him requiring him to show causewhy he should not be disbarred; and the time to file aresponse having expired;

It is ordered that Jonathan James Ezer is disbarredfrom the practice of law in this Court.

Karl William Viehe, of Washington, D.C., havingbeen suspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of January 8, 2001; and a rule having been issuedand served upon him requiring him to show cause why heshould not be disbarred; and the time to file a responsehaving expired;

It is ordered that Karl William Viehe is disbarredfrom the practice of law in this Court.

Michael Neal Bledsoe, of Chicago, Illinois, havingbeen suspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of January 8, 2001; and a rule having been issuedand served upon him requiring him to show cause why heshould not be disbarred; and the time to file a responsehaving expired;

It is ordered that Michael Neal Bledsoe isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Arthur A. Coia, of Providence, Rhode Island, havingbeen suspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of January 8, 2001; and a rule having been issuedand served upon him requiring him to show cause why heshould not be disbarred; and the time to file a responsehaving expired;

It is ordered that Arthur A. Coia is disbarred fromthe practice of law in this Court.

James Ciccone, of New York, New York, having beensuspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of January 8, 2001; and a rule having been issuedrequiring him to show cause why he should not bedisbarred;

It is ordered that James Ciccone is disbarred fromthe practice of law in this Court.

Charles Ticknor Erion, of Warner Robins, Georgia,having been suspended from the practice of law in thisCourt by order of January 8, 2001; and a rule havingbeen issued requiring him to show cause why he shouldnot be disbarred;

It is ordered that Charles Ticknor Erion isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Darryl Bradley Segraves, of Atlanta, Georgia,having been suspended from the practice of law in thisCourt by order of January 8, 2001; and a rule havingbeen issued and served upon him requiring him to showcause why he should not be disbarred; and the time tofile a response having expired;

It is ordered that Darryl Bradley Segraves isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Robert Othniel Walsh, of Porterville, California,having been suspended from the practice of law in thisCourt by order of January 8, 2001; and a rule havingbeen issued requiring him to show cause why he shouldnot be disbarred;

It is ordered that Robert Othniel Walsh isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Timothy B. McFlynn, of Aspen, Colorado, having beensuspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of January 16, 2001; and a rule having been issuedand served upon him requiring him to show cause why heshould not be disbarred; and the time to file a responsehaving expired;

It is ordered that Timothy B. McFlynn is disbarredfrom the practice of law in this Court.

David Michael Adams, of Charleston, South Carolina,having been suspended from the practice of law in thisCourt by order of January 22, 2001; and a rule havingbeen issued requiring him to show cause why he shouldnot be disbarred;

It is ordered that David Michael Adams is disbarredfrom the practice of law in this Court.

Kalam Muttalib, of Cleveland, Ohio, having beensuspended from the practice of law in this Court byorder of February 20, 2001; and a rule having beenissued requiring him to show cause why he should not bedisbarred;

It is ordered that Kalam Muttalib is disbarred fromthe practice of law in this Court.

Kenneth Thomas Schachleiter, of Cincinnati, Ohio,having been suspended from the practice of law in thisCourt by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule havingbeen issued and served upon him requiring him to showcause why he should not be disbarred; and the time tofile a response having expired;

It is ordered that Kenneth Thomas Schachleiter isdisbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

RECESS ORDER

The Court will take a recess from todayuntil Monday, May 21, 2001.